Case Law: ITO vs. Superline Construction P. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)

S. 68 (bogus share capital): Despite statement of Mukesh C. Choksi & Jayesh Sampat admitting bogus share capital, addition cannot be made in assessee-company’s hands

If the share application money is received by the assessee company from alleged bogus share holders who’s name are given to the AO then the department is free to proceed to reopen their individual assessments in accordance with law but it cannot be regarded as undisclosed income of assessee company

ITO vs. Superline Construction P. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)

One Response to “Case Law: ITO vs. Superline Construction P. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)”

  1. rakesh Says:

    Helpful information for me, I noted some interested points!
    Tata Steel Share Price


Share your views